THE DIFFERENCE OF METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS OF READING STRATEGIES BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE EFL STUDENTS
Abstract
Abstract: The aims of this research is to find out whether there is any significant difference or not in the use of reading strategies between male and female EFL students in MA AN NUR language major because many of the students did not know what kind of the strategies that should be used for reading process. This study applied quantitative approach with ex-post facto method, the instrument was used MARSI questionnaire and analyzed by using independent sample t-test. The result of this study showed that female more use the strategies consisted of global, support, problem solving reading strategies than male students, The results of the independent samples t-test data showed that global reading strategies females and males had t-value -6.911 and significant level of 0.000, support reading strategies females and males had the t-value -7.885 and significant level of 0.000 and problem-solving reading strategies females and males had the t-value -7.769 and significant level of 0.000 < 0.01. It can be concluded that males and females have significantly difference of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in EFL students.
.
Key Words: reading strategies, MARSI questionnaire, male and female.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Goes, M. K. (2013). Ex-post Facto Research. dissertationrecipes. http://www.dissertationrecipes.com/, 01-02.
Griva, D. A. (2009). Awareness of reading Strategy use and reading comprehension among poor and good readers. Elementary Education Online. https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/90854 , 283-297.
Jaturapitakkul, T. D. (2016). The Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies by Thai EFL Learners Studying Vietnamese as a Third Langauge. Language Education and acquisition Research Network (LEARN), 105-121.
J.ANDERSON, N. (2004). Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness of ESL and EFL Learners. The CATESOL Joournal, http://www.catesoljournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/CJ16_anderson.pdf 11-27.
Karbalaei. (2019). A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers . Reading Matrix. www.readingmatrix.com, 165-180.
Küçükoğlu. (2013). Improving Reading Skill Trough Effective Reading Strategies. SciVerse ScienceDirect. https://sci-hub.tw/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257718591_Improving_Reading_Skills_Through_Effective_Reading_Strategies/link/551bd6d30cf2fe6cbf75f12b/download, 709-714.
Latief, M. A. (2017). Research Methods on Language Learning an Introduction. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Lee, M.-L. (2012). A Study of the Selection of Reading Strategies among Genders by EFL College Students. ELSEVIER. https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com,310-319.
Nuryadi, T. D. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Statistik Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Sibuku Media.
Poole, A. (2005). Gender Differences in Reading Strategy Use Among ESL College Students. College Reading and Learning. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ739983.pdf, 7-18.
R.Sheorey&Mokhtari. (2000). Differences in The Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among Native and Non-Native Readers. PERGAMON, http://www.elsevier.com/locate/system, 431-449.
Saeed Taki&Gholam Hossein Soleimani. (2012). Social Science, 171-181.
Zayed, M. A. (2016). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Among English as Foreign Language (EFL) Preservice Teacher: An Exploration of Gender and Development Differences. researchget.net. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304104262_Metacognitive_Awareness_of_Reading_Strategies_among_English_as_a_Foreign_Language_EFL_Preservice_Teachers_An_Exploration_of_Gender_and_Developmental_Differences?enrichId=rgreq-9ece72e07c4c798d4469fcf9c3a61a06-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzMwNDEwNDI2MjtBUzo0NzU0NTkyMDYwMjkzMTJAMTQ5MDM2OTcxNjQwNQ%3D%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf ,46-57.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.