THE EFFECT OF CONSCIOUSNESS-RAISING TASK (CRT) ON STUDENTS’ GRAMMARCOMPETENCE

Mahfud Mahfud

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the implementation of Consciousness Raising Task on learners’ grammar competence The aims of this research was to discover the effect of consciousness raising task of students’ grammar competence of basic level at Al-Fitrah English Course pare Kediri. This study utilized pre-experimental design also, this study was finished in six meetings. First meeting was pre-test, second until fifth meeting was treatment and the sixth meeting was post test. The data was collected by utilizing multiple choice of Grammar test. The data gained were analyzed by using paired sample t-test formula. After doing the pre-experimental research steps, the researcher got some data. The data gave information that there was significant difference on students’ grammar competence by using Consciousness Raising Task. It was discovered that the mean score of the pre-test was 57.40 and the mean score of the post-test was 73.80. From the data it can be concluded that there are differences of the results because mean score pretest 57.40 is lower than the mean score of post test 73.80. Therefore, it could be inferred that the application of Consciousness Raising Task is compelling.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Altenberg, E.P and Vago, R.M. 2010. English Grammar understanding the basic.united stated of America: Cambridge University Press

Amirian, S.M.R 2012. The effect of grammar consciousness raising tasks on EFL learners’ performance.International journal of linguistic 4 (3)

Azar, B.S 2002. Understanding and using English grammar.Third edition. New york: Longman

Carter, R and McCarthy, M. 2006. Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Fatemipour, H., & Hemmati, S. (2015). Impact of Consciousness-Raising Activities on Young English Language Learners' Grammar Performance. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 1-10.

Halim, S. (2016). Using Questions Box in Teaching Simple Past Tense. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 3(2), 131-140.

Iskandar, J. 2015. Grammar consciousness raising activities and their impact on students grammatical competences: JEELS 2 (1)

Latief, A.M. 2017. Research Methods on Language Learning An Introduction.

Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang

Mahjabeen et al. 2017.Difficulty Index, Discrimination Index and Distractor

Efficiency in Multiple Choice Questions.

Mohamed, N. (2004). Consciousness-raising tasks: A learner perspective. ELT journal, 58(3), 228-237.

Oliva, B., Meehan, P., & Luque Colombre, C. English Grammar: Basics.

Richards, J.C. and Schmidt, R. 2002. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. London:Pearson Education Limited

Saukah, A. 2013. Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang Press

Schachter, P., & Shopen, T. (1985). Parts-of-speech systems. Language typology and syntactic description, 1, 3-61.

Sulistyo, G, H. 2011. Reading for Meaning; Theories, Teaching Strategies, and Assessment. Malang: Pustaka Kaiswaran.

Trask, R. L., & Trask, R. L. (1999). Key concepts in language and linguistics. Psychology Press.

Troike, M. S. 2006. Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press

Widiati, U and Cahyono, B.Y. 2006. Teaching of EFL writing in the Indonesian context : the state of art. Journal ilmu pendidikan 13 (3)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.