DOES MODIFIED COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING (MCSR) AFFECT STUDENTS READING COMPREENSION?: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF ITERPERSONAL INTELLIGENCE

Qurrotul A'yun

Abstract


Abstact:

The objectives of the study were (1) to know whether modified collaborative strategic reading (MCSR) affect reading comprehension ability of the second grade students or not (2) to know which one the students who have high and low interpersonal intelligence on their reading comprehension (3) to know whether or not there is interaction between modified collaborative strategic reading and interpersonal intelligence.This study used factorial design. The population of this study was all of the classes at second grade at the school, and the researcher chose the sample using shuffle. Pre-test and post-test and also questionnaire were being the instrument of this study. The test consisted 30 items which had been validated by the expert, and it used content validity. It was proved by the result of analysis hypothesis testing that the sig. value on sig. (2-tailed) is 0.04. Actually, the sig. value (0.04) is lower than 0.05, so H0 is rejected. It means that MCSR had significant effect on students’ reading comprehension. Then, to get the result of the second and third research problem, this study used two-way ANNOVA. The answer is that there is interaction between MCSR and interpersonal intelligence on reading comprehension.

 

Keywords: modified collaborative strategic reading,reading comprehension, interpersonal intelligence.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Abidin, M. J. Z., & Riswanto. 2012.Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) within

Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Perspectives. Internatonal Journal ofHumanities and Social Science. 2. 3.Pp. 192-198.

Armstrong, T. (2003). The multiple intelligences of reading and writing: Making

the words come alive. Alexandria: Association for Supervision.

Anderson, J Charles. 2000. Assesing Reading. Cambridge University Press.

Cahyono, Yudi and Mukminatien, Nur. (2011). Techniques and Strategies to Enhance English Language Learning. Malang: State University of Malang Press.

Choo, T, O, L., Eng, T, K., & Ahmad, N. (2011).Effects of Reciprocal Teaching Strategies.The reading matrix. Vol 11 (2): 140-148.

Cooper, T., Greive, C. (2011).The Effectiveness of the Method of Reciprocal Teaching. Research and Schoolarship. Vol 3 (1): 45-52.

ElKaumy, A.S.K. 2004. Metacognition and reading comprehension: current

trends in theory and research,[online at www.eric.ed.gov].

Fotovatian, S., & Shokrpour, N. (2007). Comparison of the efficiency of reading

Comprehension strategies on Iranian university students’ comprehension. Journal of College Reading & Learning, 37 (2), 47-63.

Gardner, H. and Hatch, H. (1989) Multiple Intelligences to School: Educational

Implications of the Theory of Multiple Intelligence. Educational Researcher, 18, 4-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1176460.

Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple Intelligences after Twenty Years. Paper presented at

the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 21, 2003.

Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational Research (4th Ed). New York: Merril.

Grabe, W. 2009.Reading in A SecondLanguage: Moving from Theory toPractice.

Cambridge University Press.

Grabe.(1992). More Reading Power.New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Graves, Michael F., Juel, Connie, and Graves, Bonnie B. 2007.Teaching Reading

in the 21st Century, 4th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longman: Third Edition.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching (fourth edition). UK: Longman.

Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA.: Kagan

Cooperative Learning.

Kanazawa, S. (2010, May). Evolutionary psychology and intelligence research

[Electronic version]. American Psychologist, 65(4), 279-289. doi:10.1037/a0019378

Komariah, E., Ramadhone, P, A, R., &Silviyanti, T, M. (2014). Improving Reading Comprehension through Reciprocal Teaching Method. SIELE Journal. P-ISSN 2355-2794

Klein, P. D. (1997, September). Multiplying the problem of intelligence by eight:

A critique of Gardner's Theory. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(4), 377-394. Retrieved September 28, 2013, from JSTOR.

Klinger, J.K, Vaughn, S. &Schumn, J.S.1998.Collaborative StrategicReading

during social studies inheterogeneous fourth gradeclassroom. Theelementary schooljournal, 99,1, pp. 3-22.

Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Boardman, A., & Swanson, E. (2012). Now we get

it! Boosting comprehension with collaborative strategic reading. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Masoud Zoghi, Ramlee Mustapha, Tg. Nor Rizan Mohd. Maasum Collaborative

Strategic Reading with University EFL Learners Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41 (1), Fall 2010.

Pardo, L.S. (2004). What Every Teacher Needs to Know about Comprehension.

The reading teacher.vol 58 (3): 272-280.

Patel, M.F. Dr. and Jain, P. M. 2008.English Language Teaching (methods, tools, and techniques). Kaipur.Sunrise Publisher & Distributors.

Rupley, William H. (1981). Indentification of Reading Instructional Practices Employed by Elementary Teachers.Educational Resource Information Centre (ERIC).

Zarei, A., &Mohseni, F. (2012). On the relationship between multiple

Intelligences and grammatical and writing accuracy of Iranian learners of English. Us-China Foreign Language, 10(7), 1306-1317.

Zoghi, M., Hazita A. &Tg Nor Rizan, Tg. M.M. 2006. CSR II: An Instructional

Technique for Reading Strategies.The Procceding of SoLLs.INTEC.07. Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.