EFL STUDENTS' PERCEPTION ON PLAGIARISM IN ACCOMPLISHING THESIS AT UNIVERSITAS ISLAM MALANG
Abstract
Abstract: Plagiarism has become one form of cheating that occurs in the academic system. Some students do plagiarism by their intelligent ways, for example by changing some grammatical structures. This study focused on knowing the students' perception. In writing with sources, plagiarism defined as the act of admission. The thesis is a scientific work written by undergraduate students on the subject of a specific topic or field. This study is a tool for providing multidimensional data required to gain an understanding of students' perception of plagiarism in the completion of the thesis. This research conducted through a questionnaire to collect the data needed. Some people think plagiarism is not good, and some think it is positive because plagiarism helps students finish their thesis. English Department students at Universitas Islam Malang did plagiarism. Plagiarism may also be positive or negative as plagiarism allows them to accomplish their tasks. Reasons include lack of motivation, laziness and less honesty.
Â
Key Words: Plagiarism, Perceptions, Thesis
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ariani, R. C. (2011). Opini mahasiswa fakultas ilmu sosial dan ilmu politik Universitas Sirlangga terhadap plagiarisme. Jurnal Sosial dan Politik.
Boyce, C. and Neale, P. (2006) Conducting In-Depth Interview: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Gibson. (1995). Organisasi dan manajemen: Prilaku, struktur, dan proses. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Harvey, G. (2008). Writing with sources: a guide for harvard students (2nded.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Howard, R.M., (2000). The ethics of plagiarism. In: the ethics of writing instructions: issues in theory and practice, pemberton. M.A. (Ed.). Ablex, Stamford.
Matlin, M. W. (1989). Teaching Psychology of Women: A Survey of Instructors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb01000.x
Morse, J. (1991). Strategies for sampling. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 127-146). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Moss, S. A., White, B., & Lee, J. (2018). A Systematic Review Into the Psychological Causes and Correlates of Plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior,
(4), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1341837
Park, C. (2003). In Other (People’s) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677
Prihantini, F. N., & Indudewi, D. (2017). Kesadaran dan Perilaku Plagiarisme dikalangan Mahasiswa (Studi pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Jurusan Akuntansi Universitas Semarang). Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 18(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v18i1.559
Razera, D. (2011). Awareness, Attitude and Perception of Plagiarism among students and teachers at Stockholm University, Stockholm University.
Soelistyo, H. (2011). Plagiarisme: Pelanggaran hak cipta dan etika. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Sutton, B, (2013). "The Effects of Technology in Society and Education" (2013). Education and Human Development Master's Theses. 192. http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses/192
Suyanto, & Jihad, A. (2009). Betapa mudah menulis karya ilmiah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Eduka.
Shaleh, A. R. (2008). Psikologi: Suatu pengantar dalam perspektif Islam. Prenada Media.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.