IMPLEMENTASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010 DALAM PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP ASAL-USUL ANAK DI PENGADILAN AGAMA TULUNGAGUNG (Studi Penetapan Nomor 860/Pdt.P/2025/PA.TA)
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 regarding the determination of a child's lineage, as well as the judge's considerations in granting the petition for such a determination in Ruling Number 860/Pdt.P/2025/PA.TA at the Tulungagung Religious Court. The study employs an empirical-juridical method with a qualitative approach. Data were obtained through interviews with a judge from the Tulungagung Religious Court, observations, and a documentary study of court rulings, legislation, and relevant literature. Data analysis was conducted using the interactive model developed by Miles, Huberman, and Saldana, utilizing Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal implementation theory comprising legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture as the analytical framework. The results indicate that Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 has been effectively implemented by recognizing the civil relationship between a child and their biological father, even when the child was born of an unregistered (siri) marriage. This implementation is supported by integrating the Constitutional Court's decision with provisions regarding child protection and human rights, thereby ensuring legal certainty and safeguarding the child's civil rights. The judge's considerations in granting the petition were based on juridical, evidentiary, and sociological aspects, as well as the child's welfare and protection. Collectively, these considerations demonstrate that the principle of the "best interests of the child" serves as the primary basis for providing legal protection to the child, without legitimizing the unregistered marriage itself. The study confirms that the implementation of Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 has contributed to strengthening legal protection for children through the judicial determination of lineage within the religious court system.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Alawi, M. N. K. (2024). Implementasi Teori Law As A Tools Of Social Engineering Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Instrumen Kontrol Sosial Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Indonesian Journal Of Law And Justice, 2(2), 1–7. Https://Doi.Org/10.47134/Ijlj.V2i2.3393
Ashari, B. (2021). Integrasi Prinsip Maqashid Syariah Dalam Putusan Peradilan Agama: Menuju Keadilan Sosial Dalam Kasus Hukum Keluarga Beni. Al-Qadlaya Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(1), 1–9. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.55120/Qadlaya.V4i01.2096
Fadilla, D. S., Nasution, A. R., & Kartika, N. (2026). Analisis Yuridis Penetapan Asal-Usul Anak Sah Dan Anak Tidak Sah Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No . 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan ( Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Medan No . 408 / Pdt . P / 2024 ). 06(09), 1711–1716.
Fitrian, R. A., Widiyanto, H., & Riyantoro, S. F. (2026). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Terhadap Penetapan Asal Usul Anak Dari Perkawinan Siri: Studi Kasus Putusan No. 340/Pdt.P/2025/Pa.Wsb Rahmi. Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 6(1), 345–362.
Ginsu, D., Suleiman, F., & Suleman, N. H. (2022). Status Anak Luar Nikah Perspektif Hukum Islam Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/Puu-Viii/2010. Spectrum: Journal Of Gender And Children Studies, 2(1), 1–14. Https://Doi.Org/10.30984/Spectrum.V2i1.396
Hernawan, H., & Widigdo, M. S. A. (2023). Peran Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penetapan Dispensasi Nikah Perspektif Children’s Best Interest : Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Wonosari. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 17(5), 3491–3506. Https://Doi.Org/10.35931/Aq.V17i5.2652
Hidayati, S. D., Judiasih, S. D., & Nasution, F. U. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Anak Yang Lahir Dalam Perkawinan Siri Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/Puu-Viii/2010 Dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 4(1), 33–50. Https://Doi.Org/10.23920/Jphp.V4i1.961
Listyowati, M. Y. E., Fauzi, F., & Rahayu, T. (2023). Kedudukan Anak Luar Nikah Terhadap Hak Waris Tanah Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata. Jiip - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 985–992. Https://Doi.Org/10.54371/Jiip.V6i2.1626
Mahmudah, N. (2019). Aspek Sosiologis Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Pada Perkara Cerai Gugat. Nizham Journal Of Islamic Studies, 7(01), 106–122. Https://Scholar.Google.Co.Id/Scholar?Hl=Id&As_Sdt=0%2c5&Q=Nurul+Mahmudah+%282019%29+—+Aspek+Sosiologis+Dalam+Putusan+Pengadilan+Pada+Perkara+Cerai+Gugat&Btng=
Nurfieni, A. (2022). Penetapan Asal Usul Anak Tanpa Melalui Tes Dna Beserta Akibat Hukumnya. Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(1), 131–150. Https://Doi.Org/10.21274/Ahkam.2022.10.1.131-150
Pahlevi, F. S. (2022). Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia : Perspektif Legal System Lawrence M. Friedman. Jurnal El-Dusturie, 1(1), 22–42.
Rahman, Y. I., & Abidin, Z. (2024). Pengakuan Status Anak Luar Kawin Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif The Recognition Of The Status Of Children Born Out Of Wedlock In The Perspective Of Islamic Law And Positive Law. Lisyabab Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 5(2), 2722–8096.
Shidarta. (2024). Memotret Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Dari Berbagai Perspektif. In Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia (Vol. 2). Https://Www.Researchgate.Net/Publication/386462289_Penerapan_Aspek_Filosofis_Yuridis_Dan_Sosiologis_Dalam_Pertimbangan_Putusan_Hakim
Sonny Dewi Judiasih, Putri Wartina Lestari, B. D. N. (2024). 1663-Article Text-9705-1-10-20241230. Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengenai Hak Waris Anak Diluar Nikah, 1(3), 348–357. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.23920/Acta.V7i2.1663
Wasman, Wardah Nuroniyah, A. D. S. (2011). Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia Perbandingan Fiqih Dan Hukum Positif. Teras.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Alamat Redaksi:
Kantor: Prodi Ahwal Syakhshiyyah
Fakultas Agama Islam (gedung Usman bin Affan),Universitas Islam Malang (UNISMA)
Phone: 081334447073, 0341 - 580547, Fax.: 0341 - 552249
Email: hikmatina@unisma.ac.id
Alamat:Â Jalan Mayjen Haryono 193 Malang 65144



