http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jh/index

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal Hikmatina is the scholarly journal that publishes original and contemporary research and thought concerning with

1. Islamic Family Law

2. Islamic Constitutional Law

3. Marriage

4. inheritance

5. Gender

6. Human Rights

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The artikel submitted to Hikmatina will be check plagiarism with turnitin.com if more than 20 percent then the article will be returned to the user to be fixed up to a maximum of 20 percent. further assigned to the editor to be reviewed by the reviewer. the final step will be reviewed back to the user and edited by the editor and published

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

FOCUS AND SCOPE

Journal Hikmatina is the scholarly journal that publishes original and contemporary research and thought concerning with

1. Islamic Family Law

2. Islamic Constitutional Law

3. Marriage

4. inheritance

5. Gender

6. Human Rights

 

AUTHOR GUIDELINES

Papers submitted for publication must conform to the following guidelines:

  1. Papers should discuss the themes of Islamic Family Law, Islam and gender discourse, and legal drafting of Islamic civil law.
  2. Papers are written either in Indonesian, English or Arabic;
  3. Papers must be typed in one-half spaced on A4-paper size;
  4. Papers’ length is about 6,000-10,000 words;
  5. All submission must include a 150-200 word abstract written in a paragraph, one spaced, and two languages: Indonesian and English;
  6. Full name(s) of the author(s) must be stated, along with his/her/their institution and complete address;
  7. All submission should be in Open Office, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format;
  8. refference make Bodynote
  9. Arabic words should be transliterated according to the Hikmatina style;
  10. Qur’an verses and hadith texts must be noted by syakal and must be translated to Indonesian;
  11. Bibliographical reference must be noted in footnote and bibliography according to Hikmatina

 

PUBLICATION ETHIC

This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher.

Duties of Editors

  • The editors of Hikmatina is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making their decisions.
  • The editor, however, double checks each article before its publication. The first step is to check plagiarism against offline database developed by Hikmatina Research Centre and, secondly, against as much as possible online databases.
  • An editor evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  • The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

 Duties of Reviewers

  • Reviewers assists the editors in making editorial decision;
  • Reviews should be conducted objectively and should be supported by arguments clearly.
  • Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editors and excuse himself from the review process.
  • Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  • Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by a proper citation. A reviewer should also call to the editors' attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  • Every manuscript submitted to Hikmatina is independently reviewed by at least one reviewer. Decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation.
  • Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

Duties of Authors

  • Authors report the original researches;
  • Data presented in the paper should be represented accurately;
  • The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted;
  • Authors responsible to only submit a manuscript that is free from plagiarism and academically malpractices.
  • Authors must state the references from the works cited;
  • Authors must write manuscripts based on the applicable rules of academic writing;
  • An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Duties of Publisher

  • Hikmatina is responsible to publish articles after the process of editing, peer-review, and layout;
  • ahikmatina responsible for academic freedom of the editors and reviewers;
  • Hikmatina responsible for privacy, intellectual property, copyright, and editorial freedom.

Plagiarism Screening

Screening Plagiarism menggunakan Turnitin dengan skor kesamaan kata maksimum 20%

 

 

REVIEWER GUIDELINES

Reviewer bertanggung jawab dalam mengevaluasi artikel yang diajukan di bidang keahlian, kemudian memberikan saran yang membangun dan jujur kepada penulis mengenai artikel yang diserahkan.

 Sebelum meninjau, harap perhatikan hal-hal berikut:

  • Artikel yang Anda tinjau harus yang sesuai dengan bidang keahlian
  • Sampaikan tanggal jatuh tempo proses peninjauan
  • Tidak ada konflik kepentingan

 PROSES PENINJAUAN

Saat meninjau artikel, harap mempertimbangkan perihal berikut:

  • Apakah judul sudah menggambarkan isi artikel dengan jelas?
  • Apakah abstrak mencerminkan isi artikel?
  • Apakah Pendahuluan sudah menggambarkan pentingnya dan keunikan dari topik?

 ISI ARTIKEL

  • Apakah ada unsur plagiarisme?
  • Apakah artikel sebelumnya yang telah dilakukan oleh penulis lain masih layak untuk publikasi?
  • Apakah artikel ini baru dan menarik untuk dipublikasikan?
  • Apakah artikel berkontribusi terhadap pengetahuan?
  • Apakah artikel mematuhi standar jurnal?
  • Apakah artikel sudah sesuai dengan tujuan dan ruang lingkup jurnal?

 METODE

Komprehensif dan Sempurna:

  • Apakah penulis secara akurat menggambarkan pelaksanaan pengabdian?
  • Apakah landasan teori atau referensi yang digunakan sudah sesuai?
  • Apakah ada metode baru? Jika ada metode baru, apakah penulis menjelaskannya secara detail?
  • Apakah ada pengambilan sampel yang tepat?
  • Apakah kegiatan yang dilaksanakan sudah cukup dijelaskan? Dan
  • Apakah paparan artikel menggambarkan kegiatan yang direkam; tepat dalam menggambarkan pengukuran?

 HASIL

Hasil artikel harus jelas dengan analisis yang tepat dan alat statistik.

 DISKUSI DAN KESIMPULAN

  • Kesimpulannya harus menjawab/menjelaskan masalah
  • Konsistensi dalam hasil, diskusi, dan kesimpulan
  • Penulis harus menjelaskan keunikan atau alasan yang kontradiktif (jika ada) dengan yang sebelumnya.
  • Kesimpulannya harus menjelaskan bagaimana kegiatan pengabdian yang lebih baik untuk ditindaklanjuti?

Setelah reviewer menyelesaikan evaluasi naskah, reviewer memiliki kewajiban untuk mengisi Formulir Reviewer. Dengan demikian, pemimpin redaksi memiliki wewenang penuh untuk membuat salah satu keputusan berikut setelah menerima komentar pengulas dan komentar editorial

  • Publikasikan seadanya
  • Bersyarat menerima dengan revisi kecil (editor akan memeriksa)
  • Bersyarat menerima dengan perubahan yang diperlukan seperti yang direkomendasikan oleh reviewer
  • Artikel harus diubah secara menyeluruh
  • Menolak