PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: ENGLISH TEACHERS’ PERCEPTION

Bagas Bagas

Abstract


The research aims to: 1) explore the description of perception of English teachers in SMAN 1 Karangrejo on the professional development, 2) describe the English teachers ‟perception on their professionalism after taking professional development, and  3) describe English teachers ‟professionalism after taking professional development.

The research was conducted in SMAN 1  Karangrejo Tulungagung. The subject of this reserach are three English teachers at the school. The research uses qualitative method research in the form of case study. The researcher used interview, observation, and document analysis as the strategy for collecting data.

The results are: 1)  all the three teachers in this research had been taking professional development before. They all agreed to the idea that professional development was an ongoing process to teach in the classroom according to the lesson plan, 2) conducting professional development supplied a lot of advantages for the three teachers. They thought that professional development brought some improvements in teachers’ professionalism. They were able to develop students’ thinking and communication skill, to manage the class, and to enrich teaching techniques, and 3) the teachers acknowledged that conducting professional development gave massive benefits for them, especially in improving their qualities as good English teachers.

 

Keywords: professional development, perception


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bailey, Biemans, Nieuwenhuis, L., Poell, R., Mulder, M., & Wesselink, R. (2006). Competence-based VET in The Netherlands: Background and pitfalls. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56, 523–538.

Banda, Pintrich. (2005). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–408.

Brown-Lewis, G. M., Wilss, L., & Mutch, S. (2001). Teachers as adult learners: Their knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching. Higher Education, 32, 89–106.

Butler, D. L., Novak Lauscher, H., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2010). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435–455.

Cano, Beijaard, & Gracia, Korthagen, F (2013). Understanding How Teachers learn as a prerequisite for promoting teacher learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13, 105–108.

Cheng, Michael and Chen, N. J. (2013). Teaching for understanding at university. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.

Darling, Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (1997). The development of learning patterns of student teachers: A crosssectional and longitudinal study. Higher Education, 57, 463–475.

Donkoh, Trigwell & Dwamena, Prosser, M. (2014). Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 409–424.

Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325–345.

Fillon, Grossman. (1968). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education – The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 425–476). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hatch, Wubbels. (2002). Teacher Learning in the Context of Educational Innovation: Learning Activities and Learning Outcomes of Experienced Teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20, 533–548.

Hatch, Ylänne, S. (2002). Broadening an understanding of the phenomenon of dissonance. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 63–78.

Hismanoglu, Veenman, S. (2010). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143–178.

Hornby,A.S. (1995). The effects of sources of motivation on teachers’ motivation levels. Education, 129, 724–733.

Hoyle, Hoekstra (1975). Experienced teachers’ informal learning: Learning activities and changes in behavior and cognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 663–673.

Lodico, Brouwer, & Vermunt, J. D. (2010). Tailor made: Towards a pedagogy for educating second-career teachers. Educational Research Review, 5, 164–183.

Lonka, K., Olkinuora, E., & Mäkinen, J. (2004). Aspects and prospects of measuring studying and learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 301–323.

Najamuddin. (2013). An empirical approach to the modelling of dissonant study orchestrations in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 5–18.

Neuman, Beijaard. (2003). Functions of the learning portfolio in student teachers’ learning process. Teachers College Record, 109, 126–159.

Oosterheert, I. E., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). Individual differences in learning to teach – Relating cognition, regulation and affect. Learning and Instruction, 11, 133–156.

Ozga, James. (1995). Teachers learning how to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 973–982.

Richards, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2002). How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 257–271.

Rodriguez, L., & McKey -Ylänne, S. (2010). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 109–120.

Rookes, Richardson, & Wilson, Richardson. (2005). Researching student learning. Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.

Shyamlee, J. D., & Phill, Verschaffel, L. (2012). Process-oriented teaching. In R. J. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New Learning (pp. 209–225). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sutter, Gijbels. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.Lilis, Samuelowicz (1992). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299–325.

Texas education agency (1997). Onderwijsontwikkelingsplan LUC/tUL. Bijlage 2: Actieplannen van faculteiten en schools. [Educational development plan University of Limburg. Appendix 2: Action plans of faculties and schools]. Diepenbeek, Belgium: University of Limburg.

Troman, Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. M. (1996). Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 89–100.

USAID. (2010). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408–428.

Vermunt, J. D. (2010). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.

Vermunt, J. D. (2007). The power of teaching-learning environments to influence student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 4, 73–90.

Wang, Korthagen, F. (2007). Linking practice and theory. The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.