INCREASING STUDENT’S SPEAKING ABILITY USING PROCEDURE TEXT THROUGH LIVE PERFORMANCE IN THE SECOND GRADE AT SMK BHAKTI LUHUR MALANG

Mikhael Beka

Abstract


Abstract
The students of SMK-Bhakti Luhur Malang hadlow achievement in English at
speaking ability. They didn’t have strong motivation in studying English, they were afraid
to speak English. Therefore, a special method is needed to improve the students‘
speaking ability. The research design of this study was a classroom action research. The
subjects of the research were 30 students. This study was done in two cycles. However
before implementing these cycles, the researcher carried out preliminary study to find
out the students’ problem in studying English.
In this class action research aims to improve the teaching and learning process
of English to measure their improvements in speaking ability, the researcher has
determined the criteria of success. And the student was said successful if student got a
least 70. The class percentage was said successful if 85% the students or more reached
the passing grade. The researcher employed the collaborative classroom action research
design and the researcher was assisted by a collaborator teacher in conducting the
study. The research was conducted in three main steps; Planning of action, observation,
and reflection. The objective of this study is to improve the speaking ability in procedure
text live performance of the second grade at SMK – Bhakti Luhur Malang. This research
use Classroom Action Research adapted from Stephan Kemmis and Robin Mc.Taggart(
1992 in Arikuntoro 2002 ) in planning, action, observing, and reflecting on the data
collected from teaching and learning process and the students speaking presentation
test. The subjects of this students were 30 students the second grade. This research of
two cycles because in the second cycle the criteria success achieved. Each of them
consisted of three meetings for teaching learning process. The data were collected
through : observation sheet and presentation test. In this research, the researcher used
kinds of procedure text live performance
The finddings indicated that using procedure text live performance is one of the
strategy-improved students ability in speaking procedure text . After the researcher
conducted the first and second cycle, it was shown that the result of the second cycle
improved. Only 5 of 30 students (15%) still received scores under the target 70. The
improvement of the students score had met the criteria of success, because twenty five
students(85%) achieved the target score (70). Therefore, it is suggeted to English
teachers and future researchers who want to improve the students English speaking
ability in procedure text live performance.
it also makes the students more interested and active in teaching and learning process.
Key Words: Increasing, Live performance, Speaking Skill.


Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Badan Nasional standar Pendidikan.2006Standar kompetensi Bahasa Inggris

SMK/MAK. Jakarta, BNSP.

Anderson, M and Anderson, K.1997. Text Types in English 2. Australia :

Macmillan.

Nunan. D. 1999. Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston : Heinine and

Heinle ; Publisher

Anderson, M. 2013. Tips On How to Build Up Your Confidence When Speaking

English.available: http://www.talktocanada.com/Accessed:Sept 20th

00.40.

Arikuntoro, S. 2002. Procedure Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta:

PT.Rineka Cipta

Ary, D. Jacobs, L., C., Razavieh. 1985. Introduction To Research in Education. New York:

Holt Rinehart Burns, A., Joyce, H. 1997.

Brown, H. D. 1987. Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice

Hall, Inc.

Brown, H. D. 2000.Teaching By Principle: An Interactive Approach To Language

Pedagogy Second Edition.NewYork: Pearson Education.

Focus on Speaking. Sydney: National Centre For Language Teaching and

Research.

Brown,H.D. 2004. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Paractices.

London: Longma

Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy, The Exercises of Control. New York: Freeman And

Company.

Brown, H. D. 2000.Teaching By Principle: An Interactive Approach To Language

Pedagogy Second Edition. New York: Pearson Education.

Burns, A., Joyce, H. 1997. Focus on Speaking. Sydney: National Centre For Language

Teaching and Research.

Creswell,Jhon,W.2012.Education Research:Planning,conducting, and Evaluating,

Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New York: Pearson Education

http://Chris@-to-i-com.html.2020,june,8

http://theenglishcamp.blogspot.com/2013/10procedure-text.html.2020,june,8

Dewaele, J. M. 2012. Personality Traits as Independent and Dependent Variables. .

MAC/MEER, April 10, 2012 7:37. (pp. 42-57).

Keefe, K., & Shi, L. 2017. An EAP Program and Students’ Success at a Canadian

University. TESL Canada Journal, 34(2).(pp.190-208).

https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i2.1264.

Latief, M. A. 2015. Tanya Jawab Metode Penelitian Pembelajaran. Malang : UM Press.

Mistar, J. 2010. Pedoman Penulisan tesis. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Universitas

Islam MalangRichards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching.

Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge UK:

Cambridge University Press.

Richards, Jack C. 2008. Teaching Listening and speaking. Cambridge: Cambidge

University Press

Tello, L .N.C. 2010. On Air : Participation in an Online Radio Show to Foster Speaking

Confidence. A Cooperative Learning-Based Strategies Study. Profile Vol.

, No. 1, April 2010. ISSN 1657-0790. Bogotá, Colombia. ( pp.91-112)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.