The Effect of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on Writing performance of Students in Intensive Course

pipit suci anggriani

Abstract


The effect of direct and indirect written corrective feedback has long been debated among the teachers and researchers. The previous studies have also been conducted and found the different results that have not been settled. It still becomes a big question, therefore the researcher conducts the same study in the different level, in non-formal education. This study aims are to find out which written corrective feedback is more effective in improving writing performance of the students and to verify the previous studies about the effectiveness of both feedback. The design of this study is a true experimental research. 21 students in intensive course participated in this study. They were divided into two groups. 10 students in experimental group One were given direct written corrective feedback and 11 students in experimental group Two were given indirect written corrective feedback. In analyzing the data the researcher used Independent sample T-test. The findings revealed that the students who are given direct written corrective feedback achieve significantly better (p: .002) writing performance than the students who are given indirect written corrective feedback. It means direct written corrective feedback is more effective in improving writing performance than indirect written corrective feedback.

 

Keywords: writing performance, direct feedback, indirect feedback.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Baleghizadeh, S., & Dadashi, M. 2011. The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on Students' Spelling Errors. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 13(1), 129-137.

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. 2012. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. London: Routledge.

Crystal, D. 2003. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (5th ed.). London: blackwell.

Elham, Almasi. 2014. The Effects of Direct vs. Indirect Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners' Writing Accuracy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research Volume 3, Issue 1, 2016, pp. 74-85.

Farjadnasab, A. H & Khodashenas, M. R. 2017. The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing. International Journal of Research in English Education.

Ferris, D. 2011. Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd Ed,). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Goksoy, A. S. 2016. The Effect of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on Students Writing. International Journal of Yasamda Liderlik.

Indriati, A. 2013. The Effect of Direct Corrective Feedback on Eight Graders’Compositions. State University of Malang.

Jamalinesari, A. 2015. The Effect of Teacher-Written Direct Vs. Indirect Feedback on Students’ Writing. Procardia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192.116-123.

Kisnanto, Y., P. 2016. The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Higher Education Students’ Writing Accuracy. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sastra. University of Kristen Satya Wacana.

Latifah, Y., Suwarno, B., & Diani, I. 2017. The Effect of Teachers’ Direct And Indirect Feedback on students Writing Ability.Social Science. 19. 63-70. University of Malaysia Utara.

Riani, S. 2016. Improving Students’ Writing Ability in Recount Text through Indirect Feedback at the First Grade of SMA Negri 5 Bandar Lampung. Unpublished Thesis. Department of English Education. Universitas Negri Lampung.

Salimi, A., & Ahmadpour, M. 2015. The Effect of Direct Vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners Written Accuracy in ELF Context. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies.

Westmacott, A. Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Student Perception, Medellín Colombia, Vol. 22, (Chile: Universidad Chileno-Británica de Cultura, 2017), p. 25 – 29.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.