The Influence of Group Work toward the Students’ Reading Comprehension (narrative text)

Roni Abdi Sabwan

Abstract



Abstract:The objective of the research is to investigate whether the students who are taught by using Cooperative Learning in reading narrative text have better reading comprehension than those taught by Traditional Teaching strategy. This study was implemented to the second grade students of Wahid Hasyim Malang in The Academic Year of 2018/2019. This study was conducted to know the effectiveness of Cooperative Learning strategy on students’ reading comprehension inreading narrative text.
This study used a quantitative research because it involved analysis of numerical data and used statistical analysis. This research is quasi experimental with pre-test and post-test. The researcher applied this design because the students have been already organized into classes, so they were selected without random assignment. The researcher can only take two different classes. Class VIII A was experimental group that consist 31 students and classVIII B was control group that consist 31 students. Students of experimental group was taught by Cooperative Learning strategy in reading narrative text and the students of control group were taught by Traditional Teaching strategy in reading narrative text. The instrument used in this study is the multiple choices test. The test was divided into pre-test and post-test. The test was used to know the students’ reading comprehension toward Cooperative Learning strategy.
From this research, it can be concluded that the students who are taught by Cooperative Learning strategy in reading narrative text have better reading comprehension than those taught by Traditional Teaching strategy. It indicates that Cooperative Learning strategy is more effective than Traditional Teaching strategy in reading narrative text. The hypothesis testing stated that the Cooperative Learning strategy gave significant effect on students’ reading comprehension in reading narrative text at second grade of junior high school students in SMP Wahid Hasyim Malang in The Academic Year of 2018/2019. It was proved from the t-value computation which was higher than t-value in t-table. The result of t-value was 3.461 and t-value in t-table was 2.000. it meant that the students who are taught by Cooperative Learning strategy have better reading comprehension in reading narrative text than those taught by Traditional Teaching strategy.

Keywords: Cooperative Learning, reading comprehension, reading, narrative text.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ammer, Christine. (1997). The American Heritage Dictionary of Idioms. New York. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.

Arikunto, Suharsimi.2006. Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.

Brown, H. Douglas. (2003). Language assessment principles and classroom practice. San francisco, California: Longman.com

Dowdy, Shirley et, al. Statistics for research 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc

Dowhower, S. “Supporting a Strategic Stance in the Classroom: a Comprehension Framework for Helping Teachers Help Students ToBe Strategic.” The Reading Teacher, vol. 52, no. 7 (1999)

Grellet, F. (1999). Developing Reading Skills. New York. Cambridge University Press.

Harmer, Jeremy. (1983). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Third Edition. UK. Cambridge University Press

Harmer, Jeremy. (1998). How to Teach English. New York. Longman.

Hatch, and Farhady. (1982).Research Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics.

Hoover, Katylee. (2008). Research Alignment for MM-H California Treasure. New York. Cambridge University Press.

Hughes, Arthur. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers; Second Edition.

New York. Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, D.W. (2009. “An Education Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning” Educational Researcher. 38 (5):365-379

Johnson, Andrew P. (2008). “Teaching reading and writing : a guidebook fortutoring and remediating students”. United States of America; British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available.

Kothari, C. R. 1990. Research Methodology: Methodes & Techniques. Former Principla, Collage of Commerce University of Rajasthan, Jaipur (India): New Age International (P) Publisher.

McKay, Penny. (2006). Assessing Yaoung Language Learner. United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.

Latief, M. A. (2016). Research Methods on Language Learning an Introduction (2rd Edition). Malang: State University of malang

Miller, S. (2005). Experimental Design and Statistics: Second Edition.

London and New York. The Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Moreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension. United State of America. The American Library Association.

Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Nunan, David. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology; a Textbook forTeachers. Sydney. Macquarie University;Prentice Hall International English Language Teaching.

Pearson, David, Dr.P. (1998). Essential Elements of Reading. The University of the State of New York. The State Education Departement.

Rowley, Mass:Newbury House

Sharan, Y (2010) cooperative learning for academic and social gains; valued pedagogy problematic practice.European Journal of Education.

Sugiono. 2012. MetodePenelitianKuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabetacv

Tsay, Mina ;brady, Miranda (june:2010) a case study of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.