Dampak Privatisasi pada Kinerja Keuangan Badan Usaha Milik Negara

Dwi Agustin Pratiwi, Anik Malikah, Siti Aminah Anwar

Abstract


Companies that function well are guaranteed to survive because they gain public trust, thereby providing people with comfort in investing in the company. A company's performance can be measured using various indicators. In this research, profitability is measured by return on equity (ROE), which is the ratio of net profit after tax to equity used to measure the level of return on shareholder investment. The privatization of BUMN in Indonesia explains that privatization causes significant changes in the nature and structure of company owners and management personnel, which ultimately has a significant impact on the performance of the privatized company. BUMN often receive the attention of important parts of society. Due to being too consumptive in the use of existing resources, criminal acts of corruption and poor profitability, BUMN is considered an inefficient business unit. The aim of this research is to find and analyze differences in the financial performance of BUMN before and after privatization.

Keywords: Privatization, Financial Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burchman, Seymour & Blair Jones. 2006. Executive Compensastion as a Support For a Growth Strategy. World at Work Journal, 3 (2), pp: 88-93

Choo, F and Tan. K.B. 2004. Effect A Structurals Equation Modelling of CEO Pay-Performance Relationships. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 5 (1/2), pp: 22-40

Dwidjowijoto, Riant dan Randy Wrihatnolo. 2008. Manajemen Privatisasi BUMN. Jakarta : PT Elex Media Komputindo - Gramedia.

Galiani, Sebastian; Paul Gertler; Ernesto Schargrodsky; and Federico Struzenegger. 2003.The Costs and Benefits of Privatization in Argentina:A Microeconomic Analysis. Latin American Research Network Working Paper R-454.Washington, DC, United States:Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.

Harper, Joel T. 2002. Privatisasi Kinerja Perusahaan Pada Negara Republik Ceko, Keuangan dan Real Estate. Department.College of Business, Florida Atlantic University.

John, A Pearce II dan Richard, B Robinson. 2013. Manajemen Strategis: Formulasi, Implementasi, dan Pengendalian. Edisi 12. Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Kaplan, Robert S., dan Norton, David P. 2000. Balanced Scorecard. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Karisma, Dkk. 2021. Pengaruh Privatisasi Dalam Kinerja Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN). Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta. Vol 5.No.2.

Komari, Nurul dan Faisal. 2007. Analisis Hubungan Struktur Corporate Governance dan Kompensasi Eksekutif. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 11 (2), hal.213-224

Masterplan Revitalisasi BUMN 2005-2009. www.bumn.go.id. Diakses 8 April 2014.

Pradhono dan Yulius Jogi Cristiawan, 2004. Pengaruh Economic Value Added, Residual Income, Earnings, dan Arus Kas Operasi terhadap Return yang diterima oleh Pemegang Saham (Studi pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 6 (20), hal:140-166.

Putri, Anggi Arinta, Bambang Sunarko dan Suwaryo. 2012. Analisis Kebijakan Privatisasi Pada BUMN Yang Listingdi Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2000- 2011. Skripsi. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.

Rorong, Ita Pingkan. 2008. Privatisasi Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 2 (2), hal:154-163

Sembiring, Seniwati. 2008. Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan dan Kebijakan Pendanaan terhadap Kinerja Keuangan pada BUMN. Jurnal manajemen, 2, (4), hal: 88-93.

Sutedi, Adrian. 2011. Good Corporate Governance. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e_Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi is indexed by:

e_Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License