CONCRETE REVIEW: PERBANDINGAN AUSTRIA, JERMAN DAN KROASIA SERTA FORMULASI IDEAL PENGATURANNYA DI INDONESIA
Abstract
This study reviews concrete review arrangements in Austria, Germany and Croatia as well as their institutionalization mechanisms in Indonesia. The method used is normative juridical, with statutory, conceptual, historical and comparative approaches. The collection of legal materials is carried out through the study of documentation and literature, then analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that the mechanism of concrete review of constitutional review in Austria, Germany and Croatia is basically the same, that is, submitted by judges from ordinary courts (courts other than the Constitutional Court) to the Constitutional Court, while the judges concerned in adjudicating cases doubt the constitutionality of a law to be applied in such cases. The only difference lies in the legal standing of ordinary court judges who can apply for concrete review. In Austria and Germany, all judges of ordinary courts of first instance to the highest court have legal standing to submit concrete reviews to the Constitutional Court when doubting the constitutionality of the law to be applied in the concrete case at hand. In Croatia, only judges of the highest court have legal standing to apply for concrete review. In order to institutionalize it in Indonesia, concrete review arrangements need to be regulated in the 1945 NRI Constitution, to strengthen the constitutional legitimacy of concrete review in the legal review system in Indonesia.
Keywords: Concrete Review, Constitutional Court, Judicial Review
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945; Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagaimana yang telah diubah dalam perubahan ketiga oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020
Buku:
Christoph Bezemek, (2012), A Kelsenian model of constitutional adjudication The Austrian Constitutional Court, Verlag: Springer
Hans Kelsen, (1961), General Theory of Law and State, New York: Russel & Russel.
Hans Kelsen, dalam Alec Stone Sweet, (1992), The Birth of Judicial Politics in France; The Constitutional Council Comparative Perspective, New York: Oxford University Press.
Konrad Lachmayer, (2017), The Austrian Constitutional Court, Camridge: Cambridge University Press
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, (2005), Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi), Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sanja Baric, (2016), The Transformative Role of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia: From the ex-Yu to the EU, Sarajevo: Analitika-Center for Social Research
Sanja Baric & Petar Bacic, Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
David P. Currie, The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994
Donald P. Kommers, (1989), The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, Durham and London: Duke University Press
David P. Currie, (1994), The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Artikel Jurnal:
Alec Stone Sweet, The politics of Constitutional Review in France and Europe, “International Journal of Constitutional Law”, Vol. 5, No. 1, (2007).
Baharuddin Riqiey, “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memutus Perselisihan Hasil Sengketa Pilkada Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 85/PUU-XX/2022”, Jurnal APHTN-HAN, Vol 2, No. 1, (2023).
Desti Fadhilla Zahra & Maria Madalina, “Peradilan Konstitusi Dalam Sejarah, Perkembangan, dan Urgensinya di Indonesia”, Souvereignty: Jurnal Demokrasi dan Ketahanan Nasional, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2022).
Eva Julia Lohse, “The German Constitutional Court and Preliminary References-Still a Match not Made in Heaven?”, German Law Journal, Vol. 16 , No. 6 (2015)
Herbert Hausmaninger, “Judicial Referral of Constitutional Questions in Austria, Germany, and Russia”, Tulane European and Civil Law Forum, Vo. 12, No. 2, (1997).
Hamdan Zoelva, “Constitutional Complaint dan Constitutional Question dan Perlindungan Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga negara,” Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol. 19, No. 1 (2012).
I Dewa Gede Palguna, (2013), Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint): Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Lothar Determann dan Markus heintzen, “Constitutional Review of Statutes in Germany and the United States Compared”, Jurnal UC Hastings Ressearch Paper, No. 299, Agustus 2018.
Miftah Faried Hadinatha, “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Mencegah Gejala Autocratic Legalism di Indonesia”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 19, No. 4, (2022).
Martin Borowski, “The Beginnings of Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court, Journal Ratio Juris, Vol. 16, No. 2, (2003).
Nurul Qamar, “Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 6, No. 1, (2012).
Rainer Grote, “Constitutional Courts in Federal States: the case of Germany”, Fédéralisme Régionalisme, Vol. 17, (2017)
Rangga Wijaya, “Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian UndangUndang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945”, IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2023).
Tanto Lailam, “Pro Kontra Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang yang Mengatur Eksistensinya”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 12, No 4, (2016).
Thomas Ziniel, Strengthening the Judicial Review System in Austria, ICL Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, (2014).
Tanto Lailam, “Perbandingan Desain Pengujian Konstitusional Pada Mahkamah Konstitusi Federal Jerman dan Indonesia”, Arena Hukum, Vol. 16, No. 2, (2023), h. 278.
Thomas Schmitz, “The constitutional review of laws - German experiences”, (2014).
Victor Ferreres Comella, “The European Model of Constitutional Review of Legislation: Toward Decentralization?”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 2, No. 3 (2004).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Powered by Open Journal System Developer(s): Public Knowledge Project