PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA PENCURIAN DAN KEKERASAN MENURUT PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MALANG NOMOR 460/Pid.B/2019/PNMlg

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The panel of judges in their considerations has not yet provided a sense of justice for the victim by imposing a prison sentence on the defendant for 2 (two) years in prison, even though in fact in the provisions of the provisions in the Criminal Code the actions committed by the defendant are punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of 9 (nine) years. The problems in this study include the setting of sanctions for the crime of theft and violence in accordance with the provisions of Article 365 paragraph 1 according to the Criminal Code, the two considerations of judges at the Malang District Court in examining cases of theft and violence number 460/Pid.B/2019/PNMlg. As well as a juridical review of the application of the judge's decision in cases of criminal acts of theft and violence in decision number 460/Pid.B/2019/PNMlg. This research is a type of normative juridical research, using a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach. The criminal sanction in Article 365 paragraph 1 is a maximum imprisonment of nine years. The judge's considerations in trying the defendant by imposing a prison sentence of 2 (two) years. Meanwhile, in its application, the judge looks at the juridical and non-juridical aspects.

Keywords: Theft, Crime, Judge's Consideration.

ABSTRAK

Majelis hakim dalam pertimbanganya masih belum memberikan rasa keadilan bagi korban dengan memberikan hukuman pidana penjara terhadap terdakwa selama 2 (dua) tahun penjara, padahal nyatanya dalam ketentuan pengaturanya dalam KUHP perbuatan yang dilakukan terdakwa di ancam dengan pidana penjara paling lama 9 (sembilan) tahun.. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini di antaranya Pengaturan Sanksi Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dan Kekerasan Sesuai Ketentuan Pasal 365 Ayat 1 Menurut KUHP, kedua Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Malang dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pencurian Dan Kekerasan Nomor 460/Pid.B/2019/PNMlg. Serta Tinjauan yuridis terhadap penerapan petusan hakim dalam kasus tindak pidana pencurian dan kekerasan dalam putusan nomor 460/Pid.B/2019/PNMlg. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan pendekatan konseptual. Sanksi pidana dalam pasal 365 ayat 1 dengan pidana penjara paling lama sembilan tahun. Pertimbangan hakim dalam mengadili terdakwa dengan penjatuhan pidana penjara selama 2 (dua) tahun. Sedangkan dalam penerapanya hakim melihat dari aspek yuridis dan non yuridis.

Kata Kunci: Pencurian, Tindak Pidana, Pertimbangan Hakim.