Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI – IPA Menggunakan Model Discovery Learning pada Materi Rumus jumlah dan Selisih Trigonometri

Teguh Permadi, Ahmad Muhyidin

Abstract


Abstrak:Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menggambarkan motivasi siswa Kelas XI – IPA dalam megikuti kegiatan pembalajaran di SMA Islama Nusantara. Dengan menggunakan metede Dicovery Learnung secara Cooperatif pada materi Rumus Jumlah dan Selisih Trigonometri. Penelitian ini dilakukan kepada 15 siswa kelas XI – IPA SMA Islam Nusantara. Namun dalam peniltian ini hanya munuju pada sub materi Rumus Jumlah dan selisih Sinus. Untuk lebih menyingkat waktu dan efiseinsi dalam penelitian. Peneliti juga memberikan kebabasan bagi siswa untuk meneksplor semua kemampuan yang dimiliki siswa. Dikarenakan siswa masih pada tingkar SMA maka peneliti juga sudah menyiapakan panduan panduan untuk menemukan Rumus Jumlah dan Selisih Sinus. Tujuan peneliti memberikan panduan agar siswa lebih mudah dalam melakukan kegiatan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan Model Discovery Learning. Akan tetapi tidak menuntut kemungkinan siswa juga bisa menggunkan cara caranya sendiri dalam menentukan rumus jumlah dan selisih sinus. Dengan bermodalkan dengan materi materi sebelumnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa adanya motivasi belajar siswa kelas XI – IPA SMA Islam Nusantara dengan menggunkan Model Discovery Learning dengan syarat guru selalu mengawal proses penemuan siswa dan memberikan arahan arahan bagi siswa untuk dapat menentukan Rumus Jumlah dan Selisih Sinus

Kata Kunci:  Motivasi belajar, Rumus Jumlah dan Selisih Sinus, Model Discovery Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antonijevic, R. 2016. Cognitive Activities in Solving Mathematical Tasks: The role of a Cognitive Obstacle. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,12(9), 2503-2515.

Bachelard G. 1938: (reprinted 1983) La Formation de l’esprit Scientifique, J. Vrin., Paris,France.

Batanero, C., Godino, J. D., Vallecillos, A., Green, D. R. & Holmes, P. 2001 .Errors and difficulties in understanding elementary statistical concepts. InternationalJournal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 25(4), 527-547.

Bishop, J. P., Whitacre, I., Schappelle B. P., & Lewis, M. L. 2014. Obstacles and Affordances for IntegerReasoning: An Analysis of Children’s Thinking and the History of Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2014, Vol. 45, No. 1, 19–61

Chazan, D., & Lueke, H. M.2009. Exploring tensions between disciplinary knowledge andschool mathematics: Implications for reasoning and proof in school mathematics. In D.Stylianou, E. Knuth, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics proof Across the grades (pp. 21-39). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.

Cooper, G. 1998. Research into Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design at UNSW, (http://www.arts.unsw.edu.au/education/CLT_NET_Aug_97.HTML. diakses 5 Desember 2016).

Creswell, J. W.2012. Educational research : planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.Boston: Pearson Education

Eraslan, A.2005. A Qualitative Study: Algebra Honor Students' Cognitive Obstacles as They Explore Concepts of Quadratic Functions. Disertasi. Florida State University Libraries

Herscovics, N.1989. Cognitive obstacles encountered in the learning of Algebra. In: C. Kieran, & S.Wagner (Eds.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 60–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hill, R. O. 2006. On The Transition in Mathematics from High School to Michigan State University. Department of Mathematics. Michigan State University.

Leff, L., S. 2009. E-Z Geometry. New York: Barron’s Educational Series.

Moleong, L. J. 2001. MetodologiPenelitianKualitatif. Bandung: RemajaRosdaKarya

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Nyikahadzoyi, M. R., Mapuwei, T., Chinyoka, M. 2013. Some Cognitive Obstacles Faced By ‘A’ Level Mathematics Students in Understanding Inequalities: A Case Study of Bindura Urban High Schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, April 2013 vol.2, no. 2.

Paul, M & Hlanganipai, N.2014. The Nature of Misconceptions and Cognitive Obstacles Faced by Secondary School Mathematics Students in Understanding Probability: A Case Study of Selected Polokwane Secondary Schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences vol.5 No. 8.

Recio, A.M. & Godino, J.D. 2001. Institutional and Personal Meanings of Mathematical Proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Volume 48: 83-99

Sternberg R. J, Sternberg, K. 2012. Cognitive Psychology, Sixth Edition. USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning

Sweller, J. 2010. Cognitive load theory: Recent Theoretical Advances. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tague, J. dan Baker, G. R. 2014. Flipping the Classroom to Address Cognitive Obstacles . American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis.

Tall, D. 1989. New Cognitive Obstacles in a TechnologicalParadigm. Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra,N.C.T.M., 87–92

Varghese, T. 2009. Secondary-level Student Teachers' Conceptions of Mathematical Proof. Issues in the undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teacher : The Journal, 1: 1 – 14


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan ini terindeks: