PENERAPAN MODEL ARGUMENTATIF TOULMIN DALAM STRATEGI “CLAIM DAN SUPPORT†PADA CARA BERPIKIR KRITIS MAHASISWA DALAM MENULIS PARAGRAF ARGUMENTATIF
Abstract
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginfestigasi keefektifan Model Argumentasi Toulmin dalam strategi “Claim dan Support†pada kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa dalam menulis esai argumentasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain eksperimen semu dengan tes awal dan tes akhir pada grup yang sudah ditentukan. Subyek penelitian ini adalah 35 mahasiswa semester empat jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Islam Malang. Kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa diukur dengan cara menilai paragraf argumentasi mereka. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan beberapa temuan, diantaranya: Pertama, nilai p (Sig.) lebih tinggi dari pada level signifikan α = 0.05 (0.239 > 0.05 yang berarti bahwa H01 diterima. Kedua, nilai p (Sig.) lebih tinggi dari pada level signifikan α = 0.05 (0.528 > 0.05) yang berarti bahwa H02 diterima. Ketiga, nilai p (Sig.) lebih tinggi dari pada level signifikan α = 0.05 (0.678 > 0.05) yang berarti bahwa H03 diterima. Keempat, nilai p (Sig.) lebih tinggi dari pada level signifikan α = 0.05 (0.231 > 0.05) yang berarti bahwa H04 diterima. Dengan demikian dapat diartikan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa yang dilihat pada hasil paragraf argumentasi antara mahasiswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan Model Argumentasi Toulmin dengan strategi “Claim dan Support†dan mahasiswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan Model Argumentasi Toulmin tanpa strategi “Claim dan Supportâ€. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Model Argumentasi Toulmin dalam strategi “Claim dan Support†tidak terbukti efektif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa dalam menulis esai argumentasi.
Â
Kata kunci: kompetensi berpikir kritis, esai argumentasi, strategi “Claim dan Supportâ€References
DAFTAR RUJUKAN
Alagozlu, N. 2007. Critical Thinking and Voice in EFL Writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9 (3): 118-136.
Arju, S. 2010. Proposing Opinion Writing as a Practice of Critical Thinking. The Reading Matrix . 10 (1): 106-114.
Ary, D., Jacobs, LC, Sorensen, CK 2010. Introduction to Research in Education (8th Edition). Belmont, CA: Wardsworth.
Bajracharya, IK 2010. Influencing Factors of Critical Thinking in Classroom Teaching. Education Quarterly , 1 (1): 1-7.
Brown, HD 2004. Language Assessment, Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Creswell, JW Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitavie, Mixed Methods Approaches 4th Ed. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Davidson, BW & Dunham, RA 1997. Assessing EFL Student Progress in Critical Thinking with the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. JALT Journal . 19 (1): 43-57.
Elsegood, S. 2007. Teaching Critical Thinking in English for Academic Purpose Program Using a "Claims and Supports' Approach. (Online), ( http://www.fyhe.com.au/past_papers/papers07/final_papers/pdfs/4e.pdf ) , accessed on October 17, 2013.
Fahim, M., & Hashtroodi, P. 2012. The Effects of Critical Thinking on Developing Argumentative Essays by Iranian EFL University Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3 (4): 632-638.
Hillocks, Jr. G. 2010. Teaching Argument for Critical Thinking and Writing: An Introduction. EJ in Focus, 99 (6): 24-32.
Hogsette, D. 2012. Develop Critical Thinking Skills through Journal Writing. (Online), ( http://uwf.edu/cutla/ ), Retrieved 17 October, 2013.
Hubert, J. 1997. How to Write Critical Argumentative Essay. (On line)
( http://publish.uwo.ca/~rmoir2/docs
/How%20to%20Write%20a%20Criti
ca% 20Essay.pdf ), Retrieved 17 October, 2013.
Karbach, J. 1987. Using Toulmin's Model of Argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing , 6 (1): 81-91.
Latief, MA 2010. Question and Answer Language Learning Research Methods. Malang: Publisher State University of Malang (UM Press).
Long, CJ 2003. Teaching Critical Thinking in Asian EFL Context: Theoretical Issues and Practical Applications, (Online), ( http://www.paaljapan.org/resources/proceedings/PAAL8/pdf/pdf022.pdf ), Retrieved 17th October, 2013.
Maftoon, P. & Sabbaghan, S. 2010. Utilizing the Analysis of Social Practices to Raise Critical Language Awareness in EFL Writing Courses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 1 (6): 815-824.
Mariyana, R. & Sriningsih, N. 2007. The Effectiveness of Active Learning Use in Developing Critical Thinking In Early Childhood. Unpublished Proposal Seminar, UPI, Bandung.
Rafik-Galea, S., Zainuddin, SZ, Galea, PV 2008. Learning to Think Critically the Toulmin Way. Seminar and Conference presented in the 13th International Seminar Conference on Thinking 2008, Sweden.
Rex, LA, Thomas, EE, Engel, S. 2010. Applying Toulmin: Teaching Logical Reasoning and Argumentative Writing. English Journal , 99 (6): 56-62.
Roscoe, JT 1969. Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. University of California: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Stapleton, P. 2002. Critical Thinking in Japanese L2 Writing: Rethinking Tired Constructs. ELT Journal , 56 (3): 250-257.
Suhartoyo, Eko. 2015. The Effect of Toulmin's Model of Argumentation Within TWPS Strategy on Students' Critical Thinking on Argumentative Essays. Malang: Thesis, Postgraduate, UM.
Sulistyo, GH 2002. Language Testing: Some Selected Terminologies and Their Underlying Basic Concepts. Malang: Department of English Literature, Faculty of Letters, UM.
Twardy, CR 2003. Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking. (Online), ( http://www.google.com/url?q=http://cogprints.org/3008/1/reasonpaper.pdf&sa=U&ei=tyaEUruZBcOtigL4wYCQBQ&ved=0CAsQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNFano8Wu3k4HMNno04i1O_INGnQXQ ), accessed October 17, 2013 .
Yuyun, I. 2010. A Study of Arguments in Senior High School Debate. (Online), ( http://www.usd.ac.id/lembaga/lppm/f1l3/Journal%20Research/vol14no1nov2010/2010%20November_07%20Ignasia%20Yuyun.pdfaccessed on October 17, 2018
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan ini terindeks:
