Parate Execution of Dependent Rights Categorized as Unlawful Acts
Abstract
Abstract : The purpose of this study is to analyze how the implementation of parate execution of dependent rights according to Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Dependent Rights and why parate execution of dependent rights carried out without permission from the District Court is categorized as unlawful acts. The method used in this study is using normative juridical research methods, using legal approaches and conceptual approaches. The results of this study show that: first, the implementation of parate execution of collateral auctions bound by dependent rights based on Chapter 1 number 28, Chapter 44 paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4) and Chapter 45 of the Minister of Finance Regulation Number: 27 / PMK.06 / 2016 dated February 22, 2016 concerning Auction Implementation Guidelines for parate auctions of collateral rights execution based on the Law on Dependent Rights, There is an "unlawful act" in determining the price limit value of the goods auctioned, if the implementation is not in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Second, the execution of dependent rights carried out without the approval of the District Court is categorized as an unlawful act, this refers to the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 3201 K / Pdt / 1984 dated January 30, 1986 which affirms that "parate execution carried out without seeking the approval of the District Court even though it is based on Chapter 1178 paragraph (2) of the Civil Code is an unlawful act and auction that done is void". This is also based on SEMA Number 7 of 2012 which states that although the creditor has held the right of dependent, which means the value of the execution rate, but if the creditor will carry out execution, it must go through the permission of the Chairman of the District Court, not directly to the Auction Office. If it is done directly to the Auction Office, but the debtor is not willing to vacate the auction object, then the Chief Justice of the District Court is prohibited from executing the emptying of the auction object.
Keywords: Parate Executions, Rights of Dependents,
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books
__________. Indonesian Banking Legilation Series. Jakarta: Citra Mandiri, 2004.
Marzuki, P. M. Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2007.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Indonesian Civil Procedural Law. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1996.
Panggabean, HP. Collection of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Regarding Banking Credit Agreements (Following Responses), Volume I. Bandung: Citra Adytia Bakti, 2007.
Poesoko, H. Parate Execution of Mortgage Rights Objects. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 1992.
Satrio, J. Execution Parate As a Means of Dealing with Bad Credit. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.
Subekti, R. Various Covenant. Bandung: Citra Aditia Bakti, 2001.
Waluyo, Bambang. Legal Research in Practice. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.
Legal Rules
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 70/PUU-VIII/2011, dated December 5, 2011.
Het Herziene Indonesich Reglement (HIR) staatsblad Year 1941 Number 44 "concerning Civil Procedure Law".
Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Dependent Rights on land and objects related to land.
Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Amendments to Law Number 7 of 1992 concerning National Banking
Minister of Finance Regulation Number 93/PMK.06/2010, "concerning Auction Implementation Guidelines"
Minister of Finance Regulation number: 106/PMK.06/2013, "concerning Amendments to Minister of Finance Regulation Number 93/PMK.06/2010, concerning Auction Implementation Guidelines".
Ministerial Regulation Number: 27/PMK.06/2016, dated February 22, 2016 "concerning auction implementation guidelines".
Supreme Court Decision Number 3021 K / Pdt / 1984 dated January 30, 1986
Journal
Arif Utomo, Yusuf. “Parate Execute At Rights of Dependents As Protection of Creditor and Debtor Assets.” Yuridika: Volume 26 No 2, (2011): 177-202.
Arifin, Zaenal. “Reconstruction of the Parate Execution of Mortgage Rights on Land Based on Justice Values”. Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Volume III No. 2. (2016): 191-199 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v3i2.1439
Cahyono, Yudhis Tira. Execution of Mortgage Rights Using Parate Execution Efforts Case Study on Decision Number 26/PDT. G/2013/ PN.Psp.Sbh (Thesis), Postgraduate Notary Master Study Program, Faculty of Law Brawijaya University. (2017).
Elisabeth Elijana, Maria. “Execution of Collateral as a Way to Return Debtor’s Debts, Proceedings of One Day Banking Seminar, Legal Aspects of Corporate Financing by Banks in Indoensia: Rules for Enforcement and Settlement of Legal Disputes in Creditor and Debtor Relations”. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan FH UI, Jakarta. (2006).
Tiara Sinaga, Butet. “Implementation of Limit Value Determination on Mortgage Auction Objects by PT. Bank Mandiri, Tbk Business Banking Center Pekanbaru”. JOM Fakultas Hukum Volume VI No. 2. (2019): 1-15.
Tista, Adwin. “Development of Indonesian Auction System”. Journal al 'Adl, Vol. 5 No. 10, (2013): 46-70, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v5i10.194
Widyantini, Ni Luh Putu, et al. “Legal Protection for Debtors (Customers) in the Implementation of Banking Credit Agreements in View of the Consumer Protection Law”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Wicara, Vol. 2 No. 1. (2013): 1-19. http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/4696
Website
Desmawati Rianto, Ria, Prija Djatmika, Siti Hamidah, Juridical Review of Execution Auction Cancellation Due to Low Limit Value, accessed via https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/119824-ID-kajian-yuridis-pembatalan-lelang-eksekusi.pdf, dated October 10, 2022.
Kediri District Court Decision Number 61/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Kdr, accessed via https://putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id/putusan/4b0271cb83fb9c295d940d567c330807, dated December 16, 2022.
South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 92/Pdt.G/2012/PN. Jkt.Sel, accessed via http://putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id/putusan/95dbf2ba17e084f6b902d337929bcdbd, dated December 16, 2022.
www.jdih.kemenkeu.go.id
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2020/ison.v5i2.24407
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Publisher :
Master Of Notary, Universitas Islam Malang
Jl. Mayjen Haryono 193 Malang 65144 ; Telp. 0341-551932, 551822 ; Fax. 0341-552249 ; Website, www.unisma.ac.id ; Email, humas@unisma.ac.id.