EFEKTIVITAS METODE LEARNING CYCLE UNTUK PENINGKATAN MAHARO KALAM DI SEKOLAH MADRASAH ALIYAH AHMAD YANI JABUNG

Ma’rufatul Azizah, Nur Hasan, Diah Dina Aminata

Abstract


Abstract

 

Maharah Kalam, the ability or skill to express the idea of the mind to the interlocutor. In learning Arabic, this skill aims to make students able to communicate orally well using Arabic. And it turns out that there in learning Arabic still uses conventional methods and this is the reason why students will have difficulty in speaking Arabic skills, and students lack understanding in learning Arabic, therefore researchers will introduce another method, namely the Learning Cycle This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the learning cycle method in increasing understanding of maharah kalam at Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Ahmad Yani. Traditional learning methods often face challenges in optimizing understanding of maharah kalam, so innovative learning approaches are needed. This research uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design. The research sample consisted of MA Ahmad Yani students who were divided into two groups: the experimental group who received learning using the learning cycle method, and the control group who received learning using the conventional method. Data was collected through pre-tests, learning interventions, and post-tests. Data analysis was carried out by testing differences in test scores between the two groups using the independent t test. The research results show that the learning cycle method significantly increases understanding of maharah kalam compared to conventional methods. These findings indicate that the application of the learning cycle method can be an effective alternative in increasing understanding of maharah kalam in Islamic educational institutions such as MA Ahmad Yani. The practical implications of this research emphasize the importance of a process-oriented learning approach and active student interaction in understanding kalam concepts. Further research is recommended to explore more deeply the factors that influence the effectiveness of the learning cycle method in the context of understanding maharah kalam.

 

Keywords: Learning Cycle, Maharoh Kalam.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Daftar Rujukan

Al-Jurjani, A. (2010). Idhoat fi Ulum al-Lughah al-Arabiyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). *The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness.* Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). "Assessment and Classroom Learning." Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice.

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). "Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning." Buku ini memberikan wawasan tentang evaluasi formatif dan sumatif yang relevan dengan pretest.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). "Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research." Buku ini merupakan referensi klasik yang membahas desain penelitian eksperimental termasuk penggunaan pretest dan posttest.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). "How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education."

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2015). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. New York: Routledge.

Glynn, S. M., & Winter, L. K. (2004). "Learning science through writing: Associations with prior knowledge, interest, and writing quality." *Journal of Research in Science Teaching,* 41(2), 173-196

Hake, R. R. (1998). "Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses." American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.

John W. Creswell. “Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research"

Karplus, R. (2002). *Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning.* New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). *Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development.* Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lujan, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2006). "Too much teaching, not enough learning: What is the solution?" *Advances in Physiology Education,* 30(1), 17-22.

L. R. Gay, G. E. Mills, dan P. Airasian. "Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications" oleh L. R. Gay, G. E. Mills, dan P. Airasian.

Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2016). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Johnston, B., & Johnston, J. (2015). Statistical Methods for Education and Psychology. New York: Wiley.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). "Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference."


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.